Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Analysis of four-band WISE observations of asteroids

Authors: Margot, Jean-Luc; Pinchuk, Pavlo; Myhrvold, Nathan;

Data from: Analysis of four-band WISE observations of asteroids

Abstract

This dataset describes a curated set of Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations of 4420 asteroids. We analyzed 82,548 carefully curated observations of 4420 asteroids with Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) four-band data to produce estimates of diameters and infrared emissivities. We also used these diameter values in conjunction with absolute visual magnitudes to infer estimates of visible-band geometric albedos. We provide solutions to 131 asteroids not analyzed by the NEOWISE team and to 1778 asteroids not analyzed with four-band data by the NEOWISE team. Our process differs from the NEOWISE analysis in that it uses an accurate solar flux, integrates the flux with actual bandpass responses, obeys Kirchhoff’s law, and does not force emissivity values in all four bands to an arbitrary value of 0.9. We used a regularized model-fitting algorithm that yields improved fits to the data. Our results more closely match stellar-occultation diameter estimates than the NEOWISE results by a factor of ∼2. Using 24 high-quality stellar-occultation results as a benchmark, we found that the median error of four-infrared-band diameter estimates in a carefully curated data set is 9.3%. Our results also suggest the presence of a size-dependent bias in the NEOWISE diameter estimates, which may pollute estimates of asteroid size distributions and slightly inflate impact-hazard risk calculations. For more than 90% of asteroids in this sample, the primary source of error on the albedo estimate is the error in absolute visual magnitude. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and operated by the California Institute of Technology.

The data are provided as comma-separated values (CSV). The field names, (types), [provenance], and descriptions are as follows: wavelength (str) [WISE]: WISE band (w1, w2, w3, or w4) ras (float) [HORIZONS]: heliocentric distance in astronomical units rao (float) [HORIZONS]: geocentric distance in astronomical unit phase_ang (float) [HORIZONS]: phase angle in degrees name (str) [WISE]: asteroid number or provisional designation mjd (float) [WISE]: modified Julian date of the single-exposure covering the source m_flux (float) [WISE]: magnitude measured with profile-fitting photometry err (float) [WISE]: profile-fit photometric measurement uncertainty in mag units H (float) [HORIZONS]: absolute visual magnitude G (float) [HORIZONS]: magnitude slope parameter data_filter_group (str) [authors]: internal description of data subset dist_x (float) [WISE]: distance in arcsec between each moving object source and its potential match in the WISE All-Sky Single Exposure (L1b) Source Table nb (int) [WISE]: number of blend components used in each fit na (int) [WISE]: active deblend flag (=1 if actively deblended) sso_flg (int) [WISE]: known solar system object association flag (0=no association, >0=association) Epoch_ID (int) [authors]: zero-based index of cluster of observations (clusters were formed when consecutive observations were more than 30 days apart)

We selected a small, high-quality subset of the data from the WISE All-Sky Data Release. These data were obtained during the WISE full-cryogenic mission phase, from 7 January 2010 to 6 August 2010. This subset includes only observations of 4420 asteroids for which there are at least three high-quality observations in each one of the four WISE wavelength bands. We added ancillary data to each observation by querying the NASA JPL HORIZONS service. The data collection procedures are described in detail by N. Myhrvold, P. Pinchuk, J. L. Margot. Analysis of four-band WISE observations of asteroids. Planetary Science Journal, 3, 2022.

Keywords

FOS: Physical sciences, Asteroids

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities