Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5061/dryad.v0c77
The spatial structure of the environment (e.g., the configuration of habitat patches) may play an important role in determining the strength of local adaptation. However, previous studies of habitat heterogeneity and local adaptation have largely been limited to simple landscapes, which poorly represent the multi-scale habitat structure common in nature. Here, we use simulations to pursue two goals: (1) we explore how landscape heterogeneity, dispersal ability, and selection affect the strength of local adaptation, and (2) we evaluate the performance of several genotype-environment association (GEA) methods for detecting loci involved in local adaptation. We found that the strength of local adaptation increased in spatially aggregated selection regimes, but remained strong in patchy landscapes when selection was moderate to strong. Weak selection resulted in weak local adaptation that was relatively unaffected by landscape heterogeneity. In general, the power of detection methods closely reflected levels of local adaptation. False positive rates (FPRs), however, showed distinct differences across GEA methods based on levels of population structure. The univariate GEA approach had high FPRs (up to 55%) under limited dispersal scenarios, due to strong isolation by distance. By contrast, multivariate, ordination-based methods had uniformly low FPRs (0-2%), suggesting these approaches can effectively control for population structure. Specifically, constrained ordinations had the best balance of high detection and low FPRs, and will be a useful addition to the GEA toolkit. Our results provide both theoretical and practical insights into the conditions that shape local adaptation and how these conditions impact our ability to detect selection.
Simulation dataThe final generation (generation 1250) of each simulation run and replicate. Simulations are divided into no selection simulations ("Nsims"), gradient selection simulations ("Gsims"), and discrete selection simulations ("H1/H5/H9sims").Simulations.zipSelection surfaces and sampling fileOne of the gradient selection files ("gradient1024x1024_N0_S1.txt") and a full set of habitat configuration rasters (H1/H5/H9 with 10 replicates each). The 500 randomly sampled individuals are provided in "sample500.csv".Surfaces_Sample.zip
genome scans, Genome scans, CDPOP, ordination methods, complex landscapes, latent factor mixed model
genome scans, Genome scans, CDPOP, ordination methods, complex landscapes, latent factor mixed model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts