Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5061/dryad.sp152
Bronchoscopy is an established research tool in Malawi, enabling collection of pulmonary samples for immunological, pharmacological, and microbiological studies. It is, however, an invasive clinical procedure that offers no direct benefit to volunteering participants when used in a research capacity alone, and thus informed consent is essential. This study aimed to explore TB patients’ understanding of research bronchoscopy, what would motivate them to participate in research bronchoscopy, and their concerns, in order to inform consenting processes for future clinical studies. We used a qualitative research design. Two focus group discussions were conducted with community members and TB patients to understand their perceptions of bronchoscopy. Transcripts were coded by multiple co-authors and thematic content analysis was used to analyse main findings. We found that Malawian patients with pulmonary TB were willing to participate in a study using research bronchoscopy for health assessment and access to improved healthcare. We identified information of value to potential participants when consenting to help assuage some of the anxieties expressed by participants. Patient and public involvement is essential to improve informed consent and institutional trust.
Perceptions of research bronchoscopy - focus group discussion 1 transcriptThis is the transcript of the first focus group discussion with the relatives / carers of TB patients in urban Blantyre, Malawi. The transcript includes the Chichewa to English translation. Anonymised data presented.Andrew fgd1.DS2_CA_Eng.docxPerceptions of research bronchoscopy - focus group discussion 2 transcriptThis is the transcript of the second focus group discussion with the TB patients on treatment in urban Blantyre, Malawi. The transcript includes the Chichewa to English translation. Anonymised data presented.Andrew fgd2.DS2_DM_Eng.docx
bronchoscopy, Tuberculosis, consent, ethics
bronchoscopy, Tuberculosis, consent, ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 19 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts