Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2012
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2012
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Love the one you're with: proximity determines paternity success in the barnacle Tetraclita rubescens

Authors: Kelly, Morgan W.; Grosberg, Richard K.; Sanford, Eric;

Data from: Love the one you're with: proximity determines paternity success in the barnacle Tetraclita rubescens

Abstract

A species’ mating system sets limits on the strength of sexual selection. Sexual selection is widespread in dioecious species, but is less well documented in hermaphrodites, and may be less important. We used four highly polymorphic microsatellite markers to assign paternity to broods of the hermaphroditic eastern Pacific volcano barnacle Tetraclita rubescens. These data were used to describe the species’ mating system and to examine factors affecting male reproductive success. Tetraclita can sire broods over distances of 11.2 cm, but proximity to the sperm recipient had a highly significant effect on the probability of siring success. There was no effect of body size or the mass of male reproductive tissues on siring success. Broods showed relatively low frequencies of multiple paternity; even at high densities, 75% of broods had only one father. High frequencies of single-paternity broods imply either that this species does not compete via sperm displacement, or that sperm displacement is extremely effective, potentially explaining the lack of a positive relationship between male investment and paternity. In addition, there was low variance in siring success among individuals, suggesting a lack of strong sexual selection on male traits. Low variance among sires and the strong effect of proximity are likely driven by the unusual biology of a sessile copulating species.

Monterey 2008 high density genotypesBrood and adult genotypes at 4 microsatellite loci for the barnacle Tetraclita rubesens from high density patches in Monterey Bay in 2008.Monterey 2007 low density genotypesBrood and adult genotypes at 4 microsatellite loci for the barnacle Tetraclita rubesens from low density patches in Monterey Bay in 2007.Bodega 2007 low density genotypesBrood and adult genotypes at 4 microsatellite loci for the barnacle Tetraclita rubesens from high density patches in Bodega Bay in 2007.Attributes of potential fathersAttributes of potential sires in the mating group of each focal individual with a brood, used to analyze factors predicting paternity success. "Distance" is the pairwise distance between potential sire and individual with the focal brood. "Bodymass" is the dry weight of all soft tissues of potential sire (g). "maleinvest" is dry weight of penis + testes + seminar vesicles" (g). "reciprocity" 1 if this individual's brood was sired by the focal individual 0 if not. "success" 1 if this individual is the inferred father of the focal brood, 0 if not. "density" 1 if mating group is from a high density patch, 0 if not.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Life History Evolution, Holocene, Animal Mating/Breeding Systems, Tetraclita rubescens, Invertebrates, Crustaceans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 134
    download downloads 9
  • 134
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
134
9