Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We used randomizations to analyse patterns of co-occurrence of sexual and apomictic (asexual) members of the North American Crepis agamic complex (Asteraceae). We expect strong asymmetry in reproductive interactions in Crepis: apomicts produce clonal seeds with no need for pollination and are not subject to reproductive interference from co-occurring relatives. However, because they still produce some viable pollen, apomicts can reduce reproductive success of nearby sexual relatives, potentially leading to eventual local exclusion of sexuals. Consistent with this, randomizations reveal that sexuals are over-represented in isolated sites, while apomicts freely co-occur. Incorporation of taxonomic and phylogenetic evidence indicates that this pattern is not driven by local origins of asexuals. Our evidence that patterns of local co-occurrence are structured by reproductive interference suggests an underappreciated role for these interactions in community assembly, and highlights the need for explicit tests of the relative contributions of ecological and reproductive interactions in generating patterns of limiting similarity.
Whitton et al Table S1This file includes details of the cytotype designations at each site, including genome size estimates, inferred ploidy and the details of how we coded each site in our randomizations.
Crepis monticola, Crepis barbigera, phylogenetic limiting similarity, Crepis bakeri, reproductive exclusion, Reproductive interference, Crepis pleurocarpa, Crepis occidentalis, Crepis, Crepis modocensis, Crepis acuminata, competitive exclusion, Crepis atribarba, Apomixis
Crepis monticola, Crepis barbigera, phylogenetic limiting similarity, Crepis bakeri, reproductive exclusion, Reproductive interference, Crepis pleurocarpa, Crepis occidentalis, Crepis, Crepis modocensis, Crepis acuminata, competitive exclusion, Crepis atribarba, Apomixis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts