Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5061/dryad.6f75v
Hexapoda, the insects and their relatives, includes over half of all described species. Because large proportions of this diversity cluster within a small set of phytophagous groups, dietary-substrates have been proposed to shape patterns of richness within the clade through antagonistic co-evolution and zones of ecological opportunity. Here we explore these processes in the context of a recent dated phylogeny of Hexapod families. Our results indicate phylogenetic clustering of specialized ecologies such as phytophagy and parasitism, but reveal no consistent associations between the use of particular dietary substrates and clade richness. We also find no evidence that diets expected to promote antagonistic co-evolution are consistently associated with elevated species richness, nor that sister clades differing in dietary state are associated with greater-than-expected differences in richness. We do, however, identify variation in the age of, and transition rates among, dietary states that are likely to play a role in the observed heterogeneity in richness among dietary classes. Based on these findings we suggest remaining circumspect about the generality of adaptive zones based on broad dietary groupings as an explanation for hexapod richness, and suggest that richness heterogeneity may be better explained by origination and transitions rates, and variation within dietary categories.
Definitions of ecological states, coding of terminal groups and referencesDryadData.docDiet Coding TableIncludes dietary coding and tip names linking to Rainford, J. L., M. Hofreiter, D. B. Nicholson, and P. J. Mayhew. 2014. Phylogenetic Distribution of Extant Richness Suggests Metamorphosis Is a Key Innovation Driving Diversification in Insects. PLoS ONE 9:e109085. [Phylogeny used for analysis]OnlineDietCoding.xls
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts