Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Aim: Species-area relationships (SARs) are fundamental scaling laws in ecology although their shape is still disputed. At larger areas power laws best represent SARs. Yet, it remains unclear whether SARs follow other shapes at finer spatial grains in continuous vegetation. We asked which function describes SARs best at small grains and explored how sampling methodology or the environment influence SAR shape. Location: Palaearctic grasslands and other non-forested habitats. Taxa: Vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens. Methods: We used the GrassPlot database, containing standardised vegetation-plot data from vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens spanning a wide range of grassland types throughout the Palaearctic and including 2057 nested-plot series with at least seven grain sizes ranging from 1 cm2 to 1024 m². Using non-linear regression, we assessed the appropriateness of different SAR functions (power, power quadratic, power breakpoint, logarithmic, Michaelis-Menten). Based on AICc, we tested whether the ranking of functions differed among taxa, methodological settings, biomes or vegetation types. Results: The power function was the most suitable function across the studied taxonomic groups. The superiority of this function increased from lichens to bryophytes to vascular plants to all three taxonomic groups together. The sampling method was highly influential as rooted-presence sampling decreased the performance of the power function. By contrast, biome and vegetation type had practically no influence on the superiority of the power law. Main conclusions: We conclude that SARs of sessile organisms at smaller spatial grains are best approximated by a power function. This coincides with several other comprehensive studies of SARs at different grain sizes and for different taxa, thus supporting the general appropriateness of the power function for modelling species diversity over a wide range of grain sizes. The poor performance of the Michaelis-Menten function demonstrates that richness within plant communities generally does not approach any saturation, thus calling into question the concept of minimal area.
All nested plots averaged_subsetThis dataset contains all data required to run the analyses of the publication: Dengler, J. et al. (2019). Species-area relationships in continuous vegetation: evidence from Palaearctic grasslands. Journal of Biogeography. The dataset comprises all 2057 nested-plot series with at least seven different grain sizes that were contained in the collaborative vegetation-plot database GrassPlot on 4 January 2019 (GrassPlot v.1.27). Details of the GrassPlot database are described in: Dengler, J., et al. (2018). GrassPlot – a database of multi-scale plant diversity in Palaearctic grasslands. Phytocoenologia 48: 331–347. The data are provided in csv format with semicolon as separator. The file comprises 28 columns and 28,155 rows (including the header).
power law, Holocene, scaling law, GrassPlot, Palaearctic grassland, minimal area, species-area relationship (SAR), vegetation ecology, Michaelis-Menten function, logarithmic function, plant biodiversity, nested-plot sampling
power law, Holocene, scaling law, GrassPlot, Palaearctic grassland, minimal area, species-area relationship (SAR), vegetation ecology, Michaelis-Menten function, logarithmic function, plant biodiversity, nested-plot sampling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts