Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Interaction intensity and pollinator-mediated selection

Authors: Trunschke, Judith; Sletvold, Nina; Agren, Jon;

Data from: Interaction intensity and pollinator-mediated selection

Abstract

In animal-pollinated plants, the opportunity for selection and the strength of pollinator-mediated selection are expected to increase with the degree of pollen limitation. However, whether differences in pollen limitation can explain variation in pollinator-mediated and net selection among animal-pollinated species is poorly understood. In the present study, we quantified pollen limitation, variance in relative fitness and pollinator-mediated selection on five traits important for pollinator attraction (flowering start, plant height, flower number, flower size) and pollination efficiency (spur length) in natural populations of 12 orchid species. Pollinator-mediated selection was quantified by subtracting estimates of selection gradients for plants receiving supplemental hand-pollination from estimates obtained for open-pollinated control plants. Mean pollen limitation ranged from zero to 0.96. Opportunity for selection, pollinator-mediated selection and net selection were all positively related to pollen limitation, whereas nonpollinator-mediated selection was not. Opportunity for selection varied five-fold, strength of pollinator-mediated selection varied three-fold and net selection varied 1.5-fold among species. Supplemental hand-pollination reduced both opportunity for selection and selection on floral traits. The results show that the intensity of biotic interactions is an important determinant of the selection regime, and indicate that the potential for pollinator-mediated selection and divergence in floral traits is particularly high in species that are strongly pollen-limited.

Trunschke et al._NewPhytologist_2017_strength of selection_DRYAD_raw dataThe data file provides row data collect in summer 2013 (Mai-August) on five phenotypic traits (flowering start, plant height, flower number, flower size, spur length) and measurements of female reproductive success (number of fruits, fruit mass) for one population of each of twelve different orchid species (Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó, D. sambucina (L.) Soó, Orchis mascula (L.) L., O. militaris (L.), and Neotinea ustulata (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, and of the rewarding species Dactylorhiza viridis (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz, Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br., Neottia ovata (L.) Bluff & Fingerh., Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich., and P. chlorantha (Custer) Rchb.). These data were used calculate mean±SE of phenotypic traits and female fitness. In addition, phenotypic traits are provided as standardized values to a mean of 0 and a variance of 1, and relative fitness as individual fitness divided by mean fitness. Standardisation is done by population and treatment. These data are used to calculate selection gradients by population and treatment, whose absolute values were then used for all higher-level analysis relating strength of selection and degree of pollen limitation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Orchis mascula (L.) L., 2013, opportunity for selection, Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó, Dactylorhiza viridis (L.) R.M.Bateman, Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz, Neottia ovata (L.) Bluff & Fingerh., O. militaris (L.), Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, Neottia ovata (L.) Bluff & Fingerh., Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br., pollinator-mediated selection, pollen limitation, Neotinea ustulata (L.) R.M.Bateman, D. sambucina (L.) Soó, Anacamptis morio (L.) R.M.Bateman, Pridgeon & M.W.Chase, P. chlorantha (Custer) Rchb., Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich., Orchidaceae

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 1
  • 3
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
3
1