Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5061/dryad.1ph92
The incorporation of data sharing into the research lifecycle is an important part of modern scholarly debate. In this study, the DataONE Usability and Assessment working group addresses two primary goals: To examine the current state of data sharing and reuse perceptions and practices among research scientists as they compare to the 2009/2010 baseline study, and to examine differences in practices and perceptions across age groups, geographic regions, and subject disciplines. We distributed surveys to a multinational sample of scientific researchers at two different time periods (October 2009 to July 2010 and October 2013 to March 2014) to observe current states of data sharing and to see what, if any, changes have occurred in the past 3–4 years. We also looked at differences across age, geographic, and discipline-based groups as they currently exist in the 2013/2014 survey. Results point to increased acceptance of and willingness to engage in data sharing, as well as an increase in actual data sharing behaviors. However, there is also increased perceived risk associated with data sharing, and specific barriers to data sharing persist. There are also differences across age groups, with younger respondents feeling more favorably toward data sharing and reuse, yet making less of their data available than older respondents. Geographic differences exist as well, which can in part be understood in terms of collectivist and individualist cultural differences. An examination of subject disciplines shows that the constraints and enablers of data sharing and reuse manifest differently across disciplines. Implications of these findings include the continued need to build infrastructure that promotes data sharing while recognizing the needs of different research communities. Moving into the future, organizations such as DataONE will continue to assess, monitor, educate, and provide the infrastructure necessary to support such complex grand science challenges.
Dryad_PlosOne Baseline vs. Follow-Up DataThis dataset combines items from a 2009/2010 survey and a 2013/2014 survey to examine changes in data sharing/reuse perceptions and practices among research scientists. See ReadMe file for details.Final Dryad PLOS ONE Scientist FollowUp OnlyCorrected version of follow-up (2013/2014) study data only. Corresponds with second half of results in manuscript.
Disciplinary differences in data sharing, Age differences in data sharing, Data reuse, Research lifecycle, Data sharing, data management, Barriers to data sharing, Geographic differences in data sharing, Surveys of scientists, Data management
Disciplinary differences in data sharing, Age differences in data sharing, Data reuse, Research lifecycle, Data sharing, data management, Barriers to data sharing, Geographic differences in data sharing, Surveys of scientists, Data management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts