Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: A test for repertoire matching in eastern song sparrows

Authors: DuBois, Adrienne L.; Nowicki, Stephen; Searcy, William A.;

Data from: A test for repertoire matching in eastern song sparrows

Abstract

Repertoire matching occurs when one songbird replies to another with a song type that the two birds share. Repertoire matching has previously been demonstrated to occur at well above chance levels in a western population of song sparrows, where it is hypothesized to serve as a low level threat in a hierarchy of aggressive signals. Here we test for repertoire matching in an eastern population of song sparrows. Previous work indicates that this eastern population differs from the western one in having lower levels of song sharing between neighboring males and in showing no association between song sharing and territory tenure. Here we confirm that males in this eastern population on average share few whole songs with their neighbors. The eastern males are familiar with their neighbors’ repertoires, as evidenced by a stronger singing response to stranger song than to neighbor song. Males in the eastern population did not repertoire match: when played an unshared song type from a specific neighbor, they did not reply with a song type shared with that neighbor more often than expected by chance or more often than in response to playback of a control song (an unshared stranger song). The results thus demonstrate a qualitative difference in vocal signaling strategies between two populations of the same species.

Sharing Analysis 2013-14Data on the sharing metric for whole song sharing and introductory phrase sharing. For each male (identified by color band combination) the sharing metric is averaged across his adjacent neighbors. Also given are song repertoire sizes and number of songs recorded.Song sharing per dyad of adjacent male song sparrowsFor each pair of adjacent territorial male song sparrows, the file gives the number of whole song types shared and the number of introductory phrases shared.Dyad analysis.xlsxPARTIAL MATCHING ANALYSISFor each focal male, whether he did (YES) or did not (NO) repertoire match playback of an unshared neighbor song and whether he sang the same target song(s) for playback of an unshared stranger song, counting partially shared songs as a repertoire match.WHOLE SONG MATCHING ANALYSISFor each focal male, whether he did (YES) or did not (NO) repertoire match playback of an unshared neighbor song and whether he sang the same target song(s) for playback of an unshared stranger song, counting only wholly shared songs as a repertoire match.neighbor:strangerNumber of songs given by subjects in response to playback of neighbor song and to playback of stranger song.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Bird song, matching, bird song, Animal communication, Melospiza melodia, animal communication

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
  • 6
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6