Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
https://dx.doi.org/10.4122/1.1...
Other literature type . 2008
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Moisture and mould growth in compact roofs – Results from a three-stage field survey

Authors: Holme, Jonas; Noreng, Knut; Kvande, Tore; Holme, Jonas;

Moisture and mould growth in compact roofs – Results from a three-stage field survey

Abstract

Compact roof systems that are done right, using materials that are not mould-prone between a correctly installed vapour barrier and the roof waterproofing membrane, have typically been considered to be not very moisture sensitive. Moisture in compact roofs has therefore perhaps not received sufficient attention. With large precipitation amounts in southern Norway in the fall of 2000, the theme of built-in moisture in compact roofs became relevant. Both in connection with roof work during periods with heavy precipitation and for example, from leakage, relatively large amounts of moisture can get trapped in the roof. This field study was performed in order to investigate how flat, compact roof behave over time when moisture has been trapped in the construction. The investigation includes 12 roofs. 10 of the 12 roofs were chosen among roofs we knew had considerable problems with built-in moisture during the building period (fall 2000). Two of the roofs did not have any previously known moisture problems, and were therefore to act as reference roofs. Phase 1, which was completed in the summer of 2002, involved the examination of all 12 compact roof constructions. Phase 2 was completed in the summer of 2004 and included an examination of nine of these roofs. The degree of moisture in the roofs was evaluated, and information was obtained about what types and how large the moisture problems have been. Even though moisture had quite clearly penetrated into the roofs, there was less evidence of moisture in several places 1½ year after the roofing period than described by the roof entrepreneurs subsequent to the roofing period. In Phase 2, after a further two years, this impression was reinforced. The results were presented at the 7th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics. The roofs are now examined for the third time (Phase 3, 2007) in order to evaluate the self-drying potential. A more thorough discussion of the self-drying mechanisms of compact roofs as well as a discussion of the risk of mould growth will be given in the paper on the basis of the field survey.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 1
  • 2
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
1
Green