Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Emirates Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Reduction of incidence of weeds in maize through the use of cover species

Authors: Modesto Da Silva Oviedo; Amilcar Servín Niz; Alcides Fernández Sánchez; Hugo González Villalba; Alvaro Huerta Maciel; Fabricio Correia de Oliveira; Derlys López Ávalos; +2 Authors

Reduction of incidence of weeds in maize through the use of cover species

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different cover crops in suppressing weed emergence and their influence on maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay (23°25'40.3"S, 57°20'00.2"W) from October 2021 to June 2022. A completely randomized design was employed with four treatments and seven replications. The treatments consisted of using cover crop species, which were planted in the research area subsequently used to cultivate maize. The cover crops used were Urochloa ruziziensis cv. ruziziensis, Stizolobium pruriens, a mixture (Urochloa ruziziensis cv. ruziziensis + Stizolobium pruriens) and a conventional system. The experiment consisted of two stages: first, the installation of the cover crop species, followed by the planting of the maize. Ninety days after planting the cover crop species, the cover crop plants were cut down. Thirty days later, Triple pro DKB360 hybrid maize was sown. The parameters evaluated in the first stage were green weed mass, dry weed mass, green crop mass, and dry crop mass at 90 days after sowing (DAS). In the second stage, the parameters evaluated were green mass of weeds at 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; weed suppression at 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; cover persistence at 0, 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; plant height at 35 and 110 DAS; number of grain rows per ear; number of grains per row; and yield. Variance analysis was carried out on the data using the F-test at 5%, and Tukey’s test at 5% was used to compare the means of the treatments. The mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriens significantly reduced weed biomass by 43.2% compared to the conventional system and showed the highest weed suppression and cover persistence up to 65 days after sowing. Moreover, this mixture produced the highest maize yield (8.42 Mg ha-1), representing a 39.4% increase over the conventional system. Treatments with U. ruziziensis alone also outperformed the control, while S. pruriens alone had limited effectiveness. These results highlight the potential of using mixed cover species as a sustainable weed management strategy that enhances maize productivity in smallholder systems.

Keywords

Urochloa ruziziensis cv. ruziziensis, Cover crop mixture, weeds, Stizolobium pruriens, Zea mays

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold