Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In our study, FISH mapping using 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA and 5S rDNA sequences was performed for the first time onOphrys tenthrediniferaWilldenow, 1805,Serapias vomeracea(Burman f., 1770) Briquet, 1910 andHimantoglossum hircinum(Linnaeus, 1753) Sprengel, 1826. A detailed study was also performed onO. tenthrediniferausing Giemsa-staining, silver-staining, CMA fluorescence banding and fluorescencein situhybridisation (FISH) with rDNA probes. We analysed two subspecies, i.e. O. tenthredinifera subsp. neglecta (Parlatore, 1860) E.G. Camus, 1908 and O. tenthredinifera subsp. grandiflora (Tenore, 1819) Kreutz, 2004 by the traditional Feulgen method and constructed the karyotype. The cytotaxonomic implications for both taxa are also discussed. InHimantoglossum hircinum, FISH and silver staining highlighted differences in the number of two rDNA families (35S and 5S) with respect toBarlia robertiana(Loiseleur-Deslongchamps, 1807) Greuter, 1967. In addition, fluorescencein situhybridisation was also applied to diploid (2n= 2x= 36) and triploid (2n= 3x= 54)Anacamptis morio(Linnaeus, 1753) R.M. Bateman, Pridgeon et M.W. Chase, 1997. As far as we are aware, this is the first case of autotriploidy observed inA. morio.
Liliopsida, Karyotype, Asparagales, Anacampti, Anacamptis; C-banding; Cytotaxonomy; FISH; Himantoglossum; Karyotype; Ophrys; Serapias, QH426-470, Anacamptis, Biota, C-banding, Serapias, Ophrys, Tracheophyta, FISH, Genetics, Himantoglossum, Plantae, Orchidaceae, Cytotaxonomy, Ophry, Research Article
Liliopsida, Karyotype, Asparagales, Anacampti, Anacamptis; C-banding; Cytotaxonomy; FISH; Himantoglossum; Karyotype; Ophrys; Serapias, QH426-470, Anacamptis, Biota, C-banding, Serapias, Ophrys, Tracheophyta, FISH, Genetics, Himantoglossum, Plantae, Orchidaceae, Cytotaxonomy, Ophry, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts