
Abstract We develop a new class of high-order accurate well-balanced finite difference (FD) weighted essentially nonoscillatory (WENO) methods for numerical general relativity (GR), which can be applied to any first-order reduction of the Einstein field equations, even if nonconservative terms are present. We choose the first-order nonconservative Z4 formulation of the Einstein equations, which has a built-in cleaning procedure that accounts for the Einstein constraints and that has already shown its ability in keeping stationary solutions stable over long timescales. By introducing auxiliary variables, the vacuum Einstein equations in first-order form constitute a partial differential equation system of 54 equations that is naturally nonconservative. We show how to design FD-WENO schemes that can handle nonconservative products. Different variants of FD WENO are discussed, with an eye to their suitability for higher-order accurate formulations for numerical GR. We successfully solve a set of fundamental tests of numerical GR with up to ninth-order spatial accuracy. Due to their intrinsic robustness, flexibility, and ease of implementation, FD-WENO schemes can effectively replace traditional central finite differencing in any first-order formulation of the Einstein field equations, without any artificial viscosity. When used in combination with well-balancing, the new numerical schemes preserve stationary equilibrium solutions of the Einstein equations exactly. This is particularly relevant in view of the numerical study of the quasi-normal modes of oscillations of relevant astrophysical sources. In conclusion, general relativistic high-energy astrophysics could benefit from this new class of numerical schemes and the ecosystem of desirable capabilities built around them.
QB460-466, General relativity, Computational methods, Einstein field equations, Astrophysics, Computational astronomy
QB460-466, General relativity, Computational methods, Einstein field equations, Astrophysics, Computational astronomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
