Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10419/247925
This study examined audit committee attributes and audit quality with emphasis on the specific requirements of the 2011 SEC code. The study applied the deductive approach via the expost facto research design and the Binary probit regression model in analyzing the various hypotheses put forward in study. Data used for the study were gathered for 150 firm-year observations from the annual reports of quoted companies on the floor of the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Findings from the study revealed that audit committee size, frequency of meetings, number of expertise and overall effectiveness all have a positive relationship with audit quality. However, only size and overall effectiveness was significant in their relationship. The study recommends that since the significant positive nature of audit committee effectiveness show that four attributes jointly account for effectiveness, firms are encouraged to establish audit committees that have all these attributes. Furthermore, the requirement of having a 6-member audit committee is sound and empirically proven to aid audit quality. Therefore, firms yet to subscribe to these should hasten up, while sanctions should be made for firms that do not.
Financial Reporting and Earnings Management, H Social Sciences (General), Audit plan, HF5001-6182, Accounting Quality, audit committee attributes, Joint audit, M41, Strategy and Management, FOS: Political science, Actuarial science, Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, FOS: Law, Epistemology, audit quality, Audit committee, Accounting, Sanctions, frequency of meetings, audit committee size, Business, audit committee effectiveness, Political science, Corporate Governance and Financial Performance, Audit Committee, Chief audit executive, ddc:650, Information technology audit, HF Commerce, Value-based Management and Economic Performance Measurement, HF5601 Accounting, Articles, Audit, Quality audit, Internal audit, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Quality (philosophy), G21, Audit evidence, Law
Financial Reporting and Earnings Management, H Social Sciences (General), Audit plan, HF5001-6182, Accounting Quality, audit committee attributes, Joint audit, M41, Strategy and Management, FOS: Political science, Actuarial science, Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, FOS: Law, Epistemology, audit quality, Audit committee, Accounting, Sanctions, frequency of meetings, audit committee size, Business, audit committee effectiveness, Political science, Corporate Governance and Financial Performance, Audit Committee, Chief audit executive, ddc:650, Information technology audit, HF Commerce, Value-based Management and Economic Performance Measurement, HF5601 Accounting, Articles, Audit, Quality audit, Internal audit, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Quality (philosophy), G21, Audit evidence, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts