Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Relationship Between Decision-Making Styles and Perceived Stress Among Postgraduate Students

Authors: Ananya Santhosh; null Vimala M;

Relationship Between Decision-Making Styles and Perceived Stress Among Postgraduate Students

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between General Decision-Making Styles and perceived stress among adults to better understand how decision-making processes impact stress levels. Employing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 222 participants using validated self-report measures for General decision-making styles, which include Rational, Avoidant, Dependent, Intuitive, and Spontaneous decisionmaking styles, and the Perceived Stress Scale. Spearman’s rho correlation analyses revealed significant associations between certain decision-making styles and stress levels. The Dependent decision-making style was positively correlated with perceived stress (p < 0.001), suggesting that individuals who rely on others for decision-making may experience higher stress due to a perceived lack of control. Similarly, the Intuitive style showed a moderate positive correlation with stress (p < 0.001), indicating that intuitive decision-makers may also be susceptible to stress. Conversely, Avoidant and Spontaneous decision-making styles showed no significant relationship with perceived stress, highlighting the nuanced impact of different decision-making styles on stress perception. These findings suggest that fostering adaptive decision-making approaches could play a role in stress management interventions. Future research should explore causal relationships and consider contextual factors influencing decision-making and stress.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!