
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as the major sources of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in water bodies, as they are not designed to remove organic micropollutants efficiently. Consequently, many technologies have been explored for WWTP upgrading, including activated carbon adsorption. However, the high production cost and environmental challenges associated with activated carbon production limit its application in industrial settings. Therefore, a wide range of alternative materials has been investigated as potential replacements. In this study, biochar produced from waste raspberry biomass was evaluated as an adsorbent for the removal of pharmaceuticals and pesticides quantified in the secondary effluent of municipal WWTP. The results showed that the biochar efficiently removed almost all detected compounds, except for three compounds (clarithromycin, propranolol, and linuron). The wastewater pH (6–8) did not significantly affect removal efficiency significantly, and kinetic tests demonstrated rapid adsorption. The potential for biochar reuse was confirmed through three consecutive batch adsorption cycles. A comparative study between biochar and powdered activated carbon (PAC) revealed some differences in efficiency, primarily attributed to the larger surface area of PAC. π-π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and pore-filling were proposed as possible adsorption mechanisms based on the adsorption efficiency and biochar characterization.
Kinetics, Charcoal, Adsorption, Wastewater, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Article, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification
Kinetics, Charcoal, Adsorption, Wastewater, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Article, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
