
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.3390/app13031349
handle: 11588/938164 , 11382/572612
The adoption of circular bioeconomy (CBE) strategies in forest-wood supply chains is a possible avenue for the future of this sector. However, the uptake of CBE models may face several barriers in the coming years, particularly in disadvantaged forest areas lacking appropriate resources and a suitable business environment to start radical innovation pathways. Based on interviews with 29 representatives (business actors and other key informants) of the forest-food sector of the Salerno province (Italy), the current study investigated the main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) involved in the transition of disadvantaged forest areas into a circular bioeconomy. Respondents also contributed to identifying the most suitable strategies in order to foster the CBE transition in the territory at hand. The paper offers an outlook for the potentialities of CBE in disadvantaged forest areas for policy actors, willing to bridge the gap between CBE agendas and territorial development challenges. The role of policy actors is particularly crucial, in order to patronize investments, stimulate improved know-how and cooperation, and fix policy inconsistencies related to biomass valorization.
Technology, wood waste, QH301-705.5, QC1-999, wood recycling; upcycling, wood recycling, upcycling, Biology (General), QD1-999, bioeconomy, T, Physics, circular economy, bioeconomy; circular economy; forest sustainability; upcycling; wood by-products; wood recycling; wood waste, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), forest sustainability, Chemistry, wood by-products, TA1-2040, bioeconomy; circular economy; forest sustainability; wood waste; wood by-products; wood recycling; upcycling
Technology, wood waste, QH301-705.5, QC1-999, wood recycling; upcycling, wood recycling, upcycling, Biology (General), QD1-999, bioeconomy, T, Physics, circular economy, bioeconomy; circular economy; forest sustainability; upcycling; wood by-products; wood recycling; wood waste, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), forest sustainability, Chemistry, wood by-products, TA1-2040, bioeconomy; circular economy; forest sustainability; wood waste; wood by-products; wood recycling; upcycling
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
views | 1 | |
downloads | 6 |