Views provided by UsageCounts
The reference joint position of upper-limb exoskeletons is typically obtained by means of Cartesian motion planners and inverse kinematics algorithms with the inverse Jacobian; this approach allows exploiting the available Degrees of Freedom (i.e. DoFs) of the robot kinematic chain to achieve the desired end-effector pose; however, if used to operate non-redundant exoskeletons, it does not ensure that anthropomorphic criteria are satisfied in the whole human-robot workspace. This paper proposes a motion planning system, based on Learning by Demonstration, for upper-limb exoskeletons that allow successfully assisting patients during Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in unstructured environment, while ensuring that anthropomorphic criteria are satisfied in the whole human-robot workspace. The motion planning system combines Learning by Demonstration with the computation of Dynamic Motion Primitives and machine learning techniques to construct task- and patient-specific joint trajectories based on the learnt trajectories. System validation was carried out in simulation and in a real setting with a 4-DoF upper-limb exoskeleton, a 5-DoF wrist-hand exoskeleton and four patients with Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy. Validation was addressed to (i) compare the performance of the proposed motion planning with traditional methods; (ii) assess the generalization capabilities of the proposed method with respect to the environment variability. Three ADLs were chosen to validate the system: drinking, pouring and lifting a light sphere. The achieved results showed a 100% success rate in the task fulfillment, with a high level of generalization with respect to the environment variability. Moreover, an anthropomorphic configuration of the exoskeleton is always ensured.
machine learning, assistive robotics, Assistive robotics; Dynamics movement primitives; Learning by demonstration; Machine learning, dynamics movement primitives, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, motion planning, Assistive robotics; Dynamics movement primitives; Learning by demonstration; Machine learning; Motion planning; Biomedical Engineering; Artificial Intelligence, motion planning, machine learning, learning by demonstration, dynamics movement primitives, assistive robotics, RC321-571, learning by demonstration, Neuroscience
machine learning, assistive robotics, Assistive robotics; Dynamics movement primitives; Learning by demonstration; Machine learning, dynamics movement primitives, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, motion planning, Assistive robotics; Dynamics movement primitives; Learning by demonstration; Machine learning; Motion planning; Biomedical Engineering; Artificial Intelligence, motion planning, machine learning, learning by demonstration, dynamics movement primitives, assistive robotics, RC321-571, learning by demonstration, Neuroscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts