
This paper emphasizes the role of effective science communication in bridging the gap between marine research and policymaking. It highlights the need for clear, objective, fit-for-purpose and engaged communication of scientific findings to policymakers and society to counter misinformation and promote informed decision-making processes. Hence, it is essential for scientists to use multiple communication channels to reach diverse audiences with clear, jargon-free language and engaging methods, tending to a holistic approach combining logical evidence-based with emotional engagement of society. Ocean literacy is key in raising public awareness and promoting behavioral changes for a new narrative on the future of the ocean. We recommend increasing funding for science communication, engaging with target audiences early, ensuring high-quality scientific evidence, and presenting positive and negative aspects of findings, showing the emotional side of the stories. Public support for marine protection and conservation policies can be enhanced, leading to effective management of marine ecosystems.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
