Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Perspectives of scie...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Perspectives of science and education
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Students in the Preparation of Qualification Research Papers

Authors: Sysoyev, Pavel V.;

The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Students in the Preparation of Qualification Research Papers

Abstract

Introduction. The capabilities of modern artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions to generate texts and solve a range of research tasks have led to their widespread use by students in the preparation of final qualification research papers (thesis) (FQRPs). However, AI-generated solutions for certain research tasks are not always of high quality in terms of content and may violate principles of academic ethics. The aim of this study is to identify the range of research tasks that students currently solve using generative AI tools when preparing their FQRPs. Materials and Methods. The study was conducted using a survey method. An online questionnaire was completed by 782 graduates (2025) from 28 Russian universities across 23 fields of study, including Law, Economics, Linguistics, Pedagogical Education, and others. Respondents were asked to indicate which research tasks they had used AI tools for during their FQRP preparation. KEYWORDS artificial intelligence, qualification paper, ethics, plagiarism Results. The survey yielded the following data: 11.56% used AI tools to generate the full text of their paper; 41.37% for outlining the structure of their paper; 64.21% for sourcing academic references; 17.14% for writing literature reviews; 46.42% for formulating research theses and arguments; 30.15% for developing practical materials (questionnaires, examples, case studies, etc.); 26.15% for statistical analysis of experimental data; 16.31% for data visualization; 56.19% for text editing; 36.66% for formatting bibliographies. Conclusion. The findings highlight the need for regulating AI use in education, including at the institutional level. Legal frameworks should address generative AI tools and define their "legitimate" application in academic and research activities.

Related Organizations
Keywords

qualification paper, artificial intelligence, plagiarism, ethics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities