Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ El profesional de la...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
El profesional de la información
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Consideraciones metodológicas sobre uso del impacto normalizado en convocatorias Severo Ochoa y María de Maetzu

Authors: Daniel Torres-Salinas; Nicolás Robinson-García; Enrique Herrera-Viedma; Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras;

Consideraciones metodológicas sobre uso del impacto normalizado en convocatorias Severo Ochoa y María de Maetzu

Abstract

En 2011 se lanzaron por primera vez las convocatorias Apoyo y acreditacion de Centros de Excelencia Severo Ochoa y a Unidades de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu. Desde entonces estas acreditaciones se han convertido en uno de los ejes de la politica cientifica espanola, distribuyendose 186 millones de € y acreditando a 26 centros y 16 unidades. A nivel bibliometrico uno de los criterios de evaluacion mas llamativos es la necesidad de que los investigadores garantes tengan un Impacto Normalizado de, al menos, 1,5. En este trabajo analizamos criticamente el origen, en los anos ochenta, de este indicador bibliometrico normalizado, las variantes que se han propuesto y las limitaciones de su uso en esta convocatoria nacional. Finalmente se ofrece una serie de recomendaciones practicas para un uso mas adecuado y preciso del indicador de Impacto Normalizado con fines evaluativos.

Country
Spain
Keywords

Research evaluation, Normalized citation, Assessment, Normalized impact, Impacto normalizado, Crown indicator, Centers of excellence., Citación normalizada, Research policy, Evaluación, Bibliometric indicators, Indicadores bibliométricos, Indicador Crown, Métodos bibliométricos, Bibliometric methods, Centros de excelencia, Research performance, Política científica

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 10
  • 7
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
7
10
Green
bronze