Commons Capitalism is easy to misread because it uses familiar legal and economic vocabulary while changing the relationships among the concepts that vocabulary usually joins. The Commons Capitalism Entity (CCE) is a commercially operating enterprise system consisting of a nonmember, nonshareholder, nonprofit Commons Corporation and one or more wholly owned, market-facing Subsidiaries. It earns profits, uses conventional financing, competes in markets, employs workers, accumulates productive capital, and is governed through corporation law. Yet it has no private residual owner; workers benefit without owning the productive corpus; the nonprofit parent is not organized around charity; productive capital is governed as a commons without becoming state property; surplus is governed rather than privately claimed; and fiduciary duties run to the corporation rather than to a beneficiary class. This Article identifies ten discourse conventions that can cause readers to translate the CCE into familiar categories before evaluating it on its own terms. Its central claim is methodological: Commons Capitalism disaggregates ownership, control, benefit, surplus, fiduciary obligation, management authority, capital formation, and intergenerational continuity, then recombines them through familiar legal components. The resulting architecture is novel less because every component is new than because conventional assumptions about which functions must travel together are rejected. Clarifying those assumptions is a necessary precursor to evaluating the CCE's economic claims, financing, governance, and legal formation in later research.