
This paper studies the determinants of currency union membership. Geographical distance, colonial heritage, language, sizes and bilateral trade between two countries as predictors of their propensity to adopt a common currency are accounted for. To deal with endogeneity, two-step probit estimation method is performed. The estimation results show that geography, colonial heritage, size, and speaking the same language predict monetary unions quite well. However, bilateral trade does not enter significantly in the second-stage estimation, thus revealing that bilateral transactions between two countries are not a useful indicator of their membership in a common currency area.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
