
Poster of IPAC´25 conference: Tuning injectors is a challenging task for the operation of accelerator facilities and synchrotron light sources, particularly during the commissioning phase. Efficient tuning of the transfer line is essential for ensuring optimal beam transport and injection efficiency. This process is further complicated by challenges such as beam misalignment in quadrupole magnets, which can degrade beam quality and disrupt operations. Traditional tuning methods are often time-consuming and insufficient for addressing the complexities of high-dimensional parameter spaces. In this work, we explore the use of advanced AI methods, including Bayesian optimization, to automate and improve the tuning process. Initial results, demonstrated on the transfer line of KARA (Karlsruhe Research Accelerator) at KIT (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), show promising improvements in beam alignment and transport efficiency, representing first steps toward more efficient and reliable accelerator operation. This study is part of the RF2.0 project, funded by the Horizon Europe program of the European Commission, which focuses on advancing energy-efficient solutions for particle accelerators.
Bayesian Optimization, Artificial Intelligence, BAX, Physics, ddc:530, Cheetah, Artificial Intelligence, Cheetah, Bayesian Optimization, BAX, MC6.D13 - MC6.D13 Machine Learning, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/530, mc6-beam-instrumentation-and-controls-feedback-and-operational-aspects - MC6: Beam Instrumentation and Controls,Feedback and Operational Aspects, Accelerator Physics
Bayesian Optimization, Artificial Intelligence, BAX, Physics, ddc:530, Cheetah, Artificial Intelligence, Cheetah, Bayesian Optimization, BAX, MC6.D13 - MC6.D13 Machine Learning, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/530, mc6-beam-instrumentation-and-controls-feedback-and-operational-aspects - MC6: Beam Instrumentation and Controls,Feedback and Operational Aspects, Accelerator Physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
