
doi: 10.17645/oas.10341
Coastal areas are increasingly exposed and vulnerable to environmental degradation and climate change, requiring adaptive governance approaches that integrate the climate–environment–health nexus. In Réunion Island, a French overseas department and EU region, two decades of science‐policy initiatives have aimed to improve coastal governance through stakeholder engagement, scientific knowledge integration, and deliberative processes. Building on the evolutionary governance theory framework, this study analyzes a body of 281 scientific research articles (2000–2024), 4 participatory projects (2005–2020), and 12 expert insights to identify land–sea governance challenges and opportunities. Scientific articles remain focused on diagnosing environmental problems rather than elaborating systemic solutions, with a predominance of ecological and conservation science. Participatory governance and long‐term strategic foresight are underdeveloped, and while digital tools are widely used for environmental monitoring, their integration into decision‐making remains insufficient. Key barriers include administrative fragmentation, weak institutional coordination, and difficulties in integrating scientific knowledge into policy processes. Four enablers emerge: strong political leadership, long‐term institutional support, a shared strategic vision, and regional cooperation aligned with European and international frameworks. Additionally, Réunion’s hybrid sociability, shaped by its colonial history, presents both challenges and opportunities for governance. While it may foster exclusivity, it can also facilitate trust‐based collaboration. A dedicated land–sea governance structure could enhance multi‐scale and multi‐level coordination among stakeholders.
participatory decision-making, social-ecological systems, muti-scale governance, marine and coastal research, environmental risk; evolutionary governance theory; marine and coastal research; muti‐scale governance; participatory decision‐making; social‐ecological systems; trust relationships, trust relationships, environmental risk, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, evolutionary governance theory
participatory decision-making, social-ecological systems, muti-scale governance, marine and coastal research, environmental risk; evolutionary governance theory; marine and coastal research; muti‐scale governance; participatory decision‐making; social‐ecological systems; trust relationships, trust relationships, environmental risk, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, evolutionary governance theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
