
This paper lays out a working hypothesis: platforms and cultural communities don’t just meet online, they co-create shifting “expression spaces.” These are the digital environments where moderation rules, algorithm tweaks, and community values collide to shape what kind of creativity can survive. I argue that authenticity online isn’t fixed — it’s negotiated, fragile, and always in motion. By treating expression spaces as living, co-adaptive systems, I offer a way to explain why cultural expression sometimes thrives, sometimes collapses, and what creators, platforms, and policymakers can do about it. This is not a final theory but a stake in the ground — a working hypothesis to test, refine, and debate.
Political Science, FOS: Political science, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Science and Technology Studies, platform studies, Digital Humanities, Sociology, co-adaptation, Business, algorithmic governance, Graphic Communications, Critical and Cultural Studies, algorithmic bias, Business and Corporate Communications, Communication, social media ecosystems, digital ethnography, creative labor, visibility reduction, FOS: Sociology, Educational Sociology, Sociology of Culture, computational content analysis, expression spaces, Science and Technology Policy, Other Sociology, Arts and Humanities, Other Political Science
Political Science, FOS: Political science, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Science and Technology Studies, platform studies, Digital Humanities, Sociology, co-adaptation, Business, algorithmic governance, Graphic Communications, Critical and Cultural Studies, algorithmic bias, Business and Corporate Communications, Communication, social media ecosystems, digital ethnography, creative labor, visibility reduction, FOS: Sociology, Educational Sociology, Sociology of Culture, computational content analysis, expression spaces, Science and Technology Policy, Other Sociology, Arts and Humanities, Other Political Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
