Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cultural Moderation, Platform Affordances, and Expression Spaces: A Working Hypothesis on Authentic Cultural Creative Expression

Authors: Pierce, J. Matthew;

Cultural Moderation, Platform Affordances, and Expression Spaces: A Working Hypothesis on Authentic Cultural Creative Expression

Abstract

This paper lays out a working hypothesis: platforms and cultural communities don’t just meet online, they co-create shifting “expression spaces.” These are the digital environments where moderation rules, algorithm tweaks, and community values collide to shape what kind of creativity can survive. I argue that authenticity online isn’t fixed — it’s negotiated, fragile, and always in motion. By treating expression spaces as living, co-adaptive systems, I offer a way to explain why cultural expression sometimes thrives, sometimes collapses, and what creators, platforms, and policymakers can do about it. This is not a final theory but a stake in the ground — a working hypothesis to test, refine, and debate.

Keywords

Political Science, FOS: Political science, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Science and Technology Studies, platform studies, Digital Humanities, Sociology, co-adaptation, Business, algorithmic governance, Graphic Communications, Critical and Cultural Studies, algorithmic bias, Business and Corporate Communications, Communication, social media ecosystems, digital ethnography, creative labor, visibility reduction, FOS: Sociology, Educational Sociology, Sociology of Culture, computational content analysis, expression spaces, Science and Technology Policy, Other Sociology, Arts and Humanities, Other Political Science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!