
pmc: PMC10054965 , PMC10632734
Abstract CRISPR‐Cas9 screens facilitate the discovery of gene functional relationships and phenotype‐specific dependencies. The Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) is the largest compendium of whole‐genome CRISPR screens aimed at identifying cancer‐specific genetic dependencies across human cell lines. A mitochondria‐associated bias has been previously reported to mask signals for genes involved in other functions, and thus, methods for normalizing this dominant signal to improve co‐essentiality networks are of interest. In this study, we explore three unsupervised dimensionality reduction methods—autoencoders, robust, and classical principal component analyses (PCA)—for normalizing the DepMap to improve functional networks extracted from these data. We propose a novel “onion” normalization technique to combine several normalized data layers into a single network. Benchmarking analyses reveal that robust PCA combined with onion normalization outperforms existing methods for normalizing the DepMap. Our work demonstrates the value of removing low‐dimensional signals from the DepMap before constructing functional gene networks and provides generalizable dimensionality reduction‐based normalization tools.
Medicine (General), QH301-705.5, Oncogenes, gene co‐essentiality network, Article, normalization, R5-920, robust principal component analysis, Cell Line, Tumor, unsupervised dimensionality reduction, Methods, Humans, Gene Regulatory Networks, Biology (General), CRISPR-Cas Systems, auto‐encoder
Medicine (General), QH301-705.5, Oncogenes, gene co‐essentiality network, Article, normalization, R5-920, robust principal component analysis, Cell Line, Tumor, unsupervised dimensionality reduction, Methods, Humans, Gene Regulatory Networks, Biology (General), CRISPR-Cas Systems, auto‐encoder
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
