Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1364/jocn.418800
handle: 2117/348927
Having ubiquitous optical monitors in dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) or flex-grid networks allows the estimation in real time of crucial parameters. Such monitoring would be even more important in disaggregated optical networks, to inspect performance issues related to inter-vendor interoperability. Several important parameters can be retrieved using optical spectrum analyzers (OSAs). However, omnipresent OSAs represent an infeasible solution. Nevertheless, the advent of new, relatively cheap, compact and medium-resolution optical channel monitors (OCMs) enable a more intensive deployment of these devices. In this paper, we identify two main scenarios for the placement of such monitors: at the ingress and at the egress of the optical nodes. In the ingress scenario, we can directly estimate the parameters related to the signals, but not those related to the filters. On the contrary, in the egress scenario, the filter-related parameters can be easily detected, but not those related to amplified spontaneous emission. Therefore, we present two methods that, leveraging a curve fitting and a machine learning regression algorithm, allow detection of the missing parameters. We verify the proposed solutions with spectral data acquired in simulation and experimental setups. We obtained good estimation accuracy for both setups and for both studied placement scenarios. It is noteworthy that in the experimental assessment of the ingress scenario, we achieved a maximum absolute error (MAE) lower than 1 GHz in filter bandwidth estimation and a MAE lower than 0.5 GHz in filter frequency shift estimation. In addition, by comparing the relative errors of the considered parameters, we identified the ingress scenario as the more beneficial. In particular, we estimated the filter central frequency shift with 84% and the filter 6 dB bandwidth with 75% higher accuracy, with respect to datasheet/reference values. This translates into a total reduction of the estimated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) penalty, introduced by a single optical filter, of 0.24 dB.
Dense wavelength division multiplexing, Infeasible solutions, Signal to noise ratio, Experimental assessment, Spectrum analyzers, Turing machines, Learning algorithms, Comunicació per fibra òptica, Regression algorithms, Vendor interoperability, Optical fiber communication, NO KEYWORDS, Bandwidth, Optical channel monitors, Fiber optic networks, Aprenentatge automàtic, Machine learning, Amplified spontaneous emissions, Curve fitting, Frequency estimation, Maximum absolute error, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Telecomunicació òptica, Optical spectrum analyzer
Dense wavelength division multiplexing, Infeasible solutions, Signal to noise ratio, Experimental assessment, Spectrum analyzers, Turing machines, Learning algorithms, Comunicació per fibra òptica, Regression algorithms, Vendor interoperability, Optical fiber communication, NO KEYWORDS, Bandwidth, Optical channel monitors, Fiber optic networks, Aprenentatge automàtic, Machine learning, Amplified spontaneous emissions, Curve fitting, Frequency estimation, Maximum absolute error, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Telecomunicació òptica, Optical spectrum analyzer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 47 | |
| downloads | 80 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts