Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Zootaxaarrow_drop_down
Zootaxa
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Zootaxa
Article . 2022
ZENODO
Article . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Revalidation and redescription of Sarcocheilichthys sciistius (Abbott, 1901) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the northern China

Authors: XUEJIAN LI; ZHIXIAN SUN; WENQIAO TANG; YAHUI ZHAO;

Revalidation and redescription of Sarcocheilichthys sciistius (Abbott, 1901) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the northern China

Abstract

Sarcocheilichthys sciistius was originally described by Abbott in 1901. It was considered as a synonym of S. nigripinnis by later researchers. However, some recent studies suggested that S. nigripinnis from the Haihe River Basin and Yellow River Basin were different to S. nigripinnis distributed in southern China, and that these populations show a closer relationship with the Heilongjiang (Amur) River endemic species—S. czerskii and S. soldatovi. In this study, we examined one hundred and twenty-five specimens from nine sites of six river basins. Based on morphological and molecular systematic studies, we confirmed S. sciistius is a valid species, and S. czerskii, S. soldatovi were synonyms of S. sciistius. Sarcocheilichthys sciistius can be distinguished from S. nigripinnis by having more lateral-line scales (40–42 vs. 38–40), shorter lower lip and different pectoral and pelvic fins color. The phylogenetic trees reconstructed by Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood based on the Cyt b gene also support S. sciistius as a distinct species.

Related Organizations
Keywords

China, Likelihood Functions, Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae, Bayes Theorem, Biodiversity, Cypriniformes, Animalia, Animals, Chordata, Phylogeny, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
  • 5
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
3
Average
Average
Average
5
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?