On Rubus ulmifolius (Rosaceae) and related taxa

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 20 Oct 2021Publisher:Magnolia PressJournal:Phytotaxa, volume 523, pages 155-166 (issn: 1179-3155, eissn: 1179-3163,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo; Beek, Abraham Van De;

doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.523.2.3

On Rubus ulmifolius (Rosaceae) and related taxa

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Nomenclature issues in the genus Rubus are discussed. In particular, R. ulmifolius and six related names, R. creticus, R. sanctus, R. parviflorus, R. vulgaris, R. non-spinosus, and R. inermis, are discussed. Further support is provided for the suggestions that these seven names are used for only one species. The names R. creticus, R. sanctus and R. parviflorus are homotypic, being R. sanctus and R. parviflorus illegitimate. A lectotype is designated for R. non-spinosus from an image of Barrelier. An epitype is selected for R. vulgaris from a modern specimen collected in Italy and preserved at L.

Related Organizations

Generalitat Valenciana
Spain

Keywords

Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Biodiversity, Rosales, Plantae, Rosaceae, Taxonomy

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	2
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average