Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Transactions of the ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 1891
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
Article . 1891 . Peer-reviewed
License: STM Policy #2
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

II. On the Internal Structure of the Carboniferous Corals forming the Genus Chætetes of Fischer

Authors: Young, J.;

II. On the Internal Structure of the Carboniferous Corals forming the Genus Chætetes of Fischer

Abstract

The genus of Carboniferous corals, forming the Chœtetes of Fischer, has long been known to palaeontologists under, at least, three generic names, viz., Favosites, Chœtetes , and Alveolites. They were first described by Fleming, in 1828, in his “British Animals,” where he placed them in Lamarck's genus, Favosites. In 1837, Fischer established the genus Chœtetes for a Russian Carboniferous coral— C. septosus , now believed to be identical with one of Fleming's species. Count Keyserling, in 1846, removed Fleming's species from Favosites , from their not having perfect walls for their corallites, and from the absence of mural pores in their walls as found in Favosites , and placed them with Fischer's Chœtetes In 1851, Professor M'Coy, in his “British Palaeozoic Fossils,” accepted Fischer's genus for Fleming's species, but in the same year, Milne Edwards and Jules Haime, in their Monograph on “Fossil Corals,” issued by the Palaeontographical Society, removed Fleming's species from Chœtetes into Alveolites of Lamarck, retaining at the same time Fischer's genus Chœtetes for his species C. radians , which, as above stated, is now believed to be identical with Fleming's British form— C. septosus. Chœtetes , however, is now the genus most generally accepted by palaeontologists for this entire group of Carboniferous corals. During last year, I was led to make an independent examination of the structure of these corals, by means of transparent sections prepared by myself for examination under the microscope. I was induced to do this, owing to a somewhat bitter dispute which had arisen between Mr. James Thomson, F.G.S., of This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 5
  • 3
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
5
hybrid