Downloads provided by UsageCounts
I n the first edition of his famous work, the “Systema Naturæ,” published in 1736, the great Swedish naturalist, Linnæus, proposed the name Graptolithus for certain natural markings occasionally found upon stones, which are not true fossils, but are mere superficial stainings, having the deceptive appearance of being organic remains. In the twelfth edition of the “Systema,” however, Linnæus unwittingly figured and described two true fossils under the head of Graptolithus. One of these, his Graptolithus scalaris, was founded upon some strange markings found upon pieces of broken stone collected in Scania, in the south of Sweden. In 1821, Dr. Wahlenberg collected some specimens of the Graptolithus scalaris from Linnæus’ original localities. These he submitted to a careful examination, and reached the conclusion that they were the remains of fossil Orthoceratites. Through the subsequent researches, however, of Nilsson, Portlock, and Barrande, who discovered and studied many genera and species of fossils of the same type as the original Graptolithus scalaris, it has been demonstrated that these so-called Graptolithus or Graptolites are the petrified remains of Hydroida, allied to the modern Zoophytes of our sea-coasts. These fossil Graptolites are all plant-like forms, and are of many different shapes—linear, leaf-like, tree-like; simple and compound. They all show peculiar notches or teeth upon their outer margins, and are now transformed into shining carbonaceous matter. They are separated by palæontologists into two main groups—the Rhabdophora and the Cladophora. The Rhabdophora stand almost alone in the animal world in the possession of a peculiar rod or
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts