
doi: 10.1111/conl.13086
handle: 10261/384029
ABSTRACT The cryptic nature of wildlife crimes challenges the detection and implementation of effective prevention and prosecution measures. Allocating often limited resources will benefit from increasing detectability through evidence‐informed integration of sentinel GPS‐tracked species. We illustrate this by analyzing the spatial use of 25 GPS‐tracked griffons and 26 reintroduced bearded vultures with anti‐poison canine unit patrols and a wildlife poisoning risk map in NW Spain. Vultures’ spatial use greatly correlated with high‐risk areas, highlighting their role in detecting poisoning events and guiding preventive anti‐poison patrolling, allowing us to approach a zonation scheme to optimize efforts in this regard. We identified poisoning hotspots where sentinel and anti‐poison canine units should be reinforced and high‐risk areas with low sentinel monitoring where on‐ground efforts should be increased. While emphasizing the potential of GPS‐tracked vultures as sentinels, our results offer an example of strategic integration to prioritize interventions and enhance their effectiveness against wildlife crimes.
patrolling, General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution, wildlife poisoning, sentinel species, strategic resource allocation, QH1-199.5, Wildlife poisoning, wildlife crime, Sentinel species, Strategic resource allocation, Patrolling, Anti-poison canine units, Wildlife crime, anti‐poison canine units
patrolling, General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution, wildlife poisoning, sentinel species, strategic resource allocation, QH1-199.5, Wildlife poisoning, wildlife crime, Sentinel species, Strategic resource allocation, Patrolling, Anti-poison canine units, Wildlife crime, anti‐poison canine units
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
