Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1109/pdp.2017.39
handle: 11573/1656235 , 11568/904566
Power-aware computing is gaining an increasing attention both in academic and industrial settings. The problem of guaranteeing a given QoS requirement (either in terms of performance or power consumption) can be faced by selecting and dynamically adapting the amount of physical and logical resources used by the application. In this study, we considered standard multicore platforms by taking as a reference approaches for power-aware computing two well-known dynamic reconfiguration techniques: Concurrency Throttling and Thread Packing. Furthermore, we also studied the impact of using simultaneous multithreading (e.g., Intel's HyperThreading) in both techniques. In this work, leveraging on the applications of the PARSEC benchmark suite, we evaluate these techniques by considering performance-power trade-offs, resource efficiency, predictability and required programming effort. The results show that, according to the comparison criteria, these techniques complement each other.
concurrency throttling; green computing; PARSEC benchmarks; power-Aware; thread packing; Computer Networks and Communications; Hardware and Architecture; Information Systems and Management
concurrency throttling; green computing; PARSEC benchmarks; power-Aware; thread packing; Computer Networks and Communications; Hardware and Architecture; Information Systems and Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts