Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
https://doi.org/10.1109/icces....
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An evaluation of enterprise architecture frameworks for e-government

Authors: Mohamed Ali Mohamed; Galal Hassan Galal-Edeen; Hesham Ahmed Hassan; Ehab Ezzat Hasanien;

An evaluation of enterprise architecture frameworks for e-government

Abstract

The development of E-government systems faces many challenges and problems including interoperability, integration, complexity and lack of standards. Enterprise Architecture is considered to be an efficient tool to overcome these challenges; however one of the important steps that must to be taken is to choose an appropriate Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF) which can be considered as a conceptual structure of what the enterprise architecture should contain and how to create it. There are many frameworks proposed but they differ in content and target audience. In this paper we present an evaluation of four widespread enterprise architecture frameworks. We introduced criteria to evaluate the frameworks from two perspectives, One based on non-functional requirements critical for the success of e-government systems and how those requirements addressed by EAFs, the second perspective based on development issues. Finally we have concluded and suggested a future work.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average