
In this paper, we evaluate hand-crafted features as well as features learned from data using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for different fundamental frequency classification tasks. We compare classification based on full (variable-length) contours and classification based on fixed-sized subcontours in combination with a fusion strategy. Our results show that hand-crafted and learned features lead to comparable results for both classification scenarios. Aggregating contour-level to file-level classification results generally improves the results. In comparison to the hand-crafted features, our examination indicates that the CNN-based features show a higher degree of redundancy across feature dimensions, where multiple filters (convolution kernels) specialize on similar contour shapes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
