
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 12705451
Cohen has reported a negative correlation between lung cancer mortality and average radon levels by county. In this paper, the correlation of U.S. county mortality rates for various types of cancers during the period 1970-1994 with Cohen's radon measurements is examined. In general, quantitatively similar, strongly negative correlations are found for cancers strongly linked to cigarette smoking, weaker negative correlations are found for cancers moderately increased by smoking, whereas no such correlation is found for cancers not linked to smoking. The results indicate that the negative trend previously reported for lung cancer can be largely accounted for by a negative correlation between smoking and radon levels across counties. Hence, the observed ecological correlation provides no substantial evidence for a protective effect of low level radon exposure.
Male, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Geography, Smoking, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Tract Neoplasms, United States, Air Pollutants, Radioactive, Organ Specificity, Radon, Linear Models, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Radiometry
Male, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Geography, Smoking, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Tract Neoplasms, United States, Air Pollutants, Radioactive, Organ Specificity, Radon, Linear Models, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Radiometry
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
views | 39 | |
downloads | 18 |