
ABSTRACT Modelling star formation and resolving individual stars in numerical simulations of molecular clouds and galaxies is highly challenging. Simulations on very small scales can be sufficiently well resolved to consistently follow the formation of individual stars, whilst on larger scales sinks that have masses sufficient to fully sample the IMF can be converted into realistic stellar populations. However, as yet, these methods do not work for intermediate scale resolutions whereby sinks are more massive compared to individual stars but do not fully sample the IMF. In this paper, we introduce the grouped star formation prescription, whereby sinks are first grouped according to their positions, velocities, and ages, then stars are formed by sampling the IMF using the mass of the groups. We test our grouped star formation method in simulations of various physical scales, from sub-parsec to kilo-parsec, and from static isolated clouds to colliding clouds. With suitable grouping parameters, this star formation prescription can form stars that follow the IMF and approximately mimic the original stellar distribution and velocity dispersion. Each group has properties that are consistent with a star-forming region. We show that our grouped star formation prescription is robust and can be adapted in simulations with varying physical scales and resolution. Such methods are likely to become more important as galactic or even cosmological scale simulations begin to probe sub-parsec scales.
stars: formation, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), galaxies: star clusters: general, FOS: Physical sciences, ISM: clouds, 530, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, galaxies: ISM, 520
stars: formation, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), galaxies: star clusters: general, FOS: Physical sciences, ISM: clouds, 530, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, galaxies: ISM, 520
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
