Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Public Health
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Landscape Analysis Towards Data Quality and Utility Labelling in the European Health Data Space

Authors: Ángel Sánchez-García; Claudio Proietti Mercuri; Nienke Schutte; Francisco Estupiñán-Romero; Carlos Tellería-Orriols; Ascensión Doñate-Martínez; Juan M García-Gómez; +3 Authors

Landscape Analysis Towards Data Quality and Utility Labelling in the European Health Data Space

Abstract

Abstract The European Health Data Space (EHDS) promotes health data sharing and secondary use across Europe. The QUANTUM project focuses on labelling data quality (DQ), utility, and maturity to support EU-wide standards within this context. This study examines current DQ assessment practices in European Data Holder institutions to inform the design of a labelling tool for the EHDS. The study explored institutional practices for DQ assurance and assessment through a survey of EU-wide Data Holders and a literature search on open-source health DQ tools with potential for labelling. The survey targeted QUANTUM partners and external institutions, addressing DQ practices and tools. The literature review followed PRISMA guidelines and combined PubMed, AI-based queries, and known sources. We obtained survey responses from 27 Institutions across 13 European countries. The results showed a high variety and heterogeneity in DQ practices and tools used, including in-house developed tools, open-source tools, commercial products, and manual procedures. Most practices allowed customization of DQ dimensions and export of DQ analyses. The systematic review identified 66 DQ tools, 53% specific to data types such as electronic health records, omics or imaging, and 47% general-purpose. The diverse DQ institutional practices and tools emphasize the need for an interoperable self-assessment DQ labelling tool that guides the measurement and completion of consolidated metrics aligned with the EHDS regulations. Based on these findings, the QUANTUM project is developing this tool to support DQ labelling of Data Holders’ datasets candidate to publication at EU Health Data Access Bodies.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average