Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1086/622346
The quantitative estimation of minerals in rock sections is generally recommended as a valuable exercise, but in practice it is far too seldom performed. The reason is that the recognized methods of estimation are very tedious, while the results, when obtained, have not hitherto been put to any systematic use in the classification of rocks. The usual methods are of two kinds, viz., (I) separations, either gravitational or magnetic, the separated portions being weighed directly; and (2) geometrical methods, involving measurement either of areas or of diameters, and sub-
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 26 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts