The availability of robust nomograms is essential for the correct evaluation of blood pressure (BP) values in children. A literature search was conducted by accessing the National Library of Medicine by using the keywords BP, pediatric and reference values/nomograms. A total of 43 studies that evaluated pediatric BP nomograms were included in this review. Despite the accuracy of the latest studies, many numerical and methodological limitations still remain. The numerical limitations include the paucity of data for neonates/infants and for some geographic areas (Africa/South America/East Europe/Asia) and ethnicities. Furthermore, the data on ambulatory BP and response to exercise are extremely limited, and the criteria for stress-test interruption are lacking. There was heterogeneity in the methodologies employed to perform the measurements, in the inclusion/exclusion criteria (often not reported), in the data normalization and the data expression (Z-scores/percentiles/mean values). Although most studies adjusted the measurements for age and/or height, the classification by specific age/height subgroups varied. Gender differences were generally considered, whereas other confounders (that is, ethnicity/geographic area/environment) were seldom evaluated. As a result, nomograms were heterogeneous, and when comparable, at times showed widely different confidence intervals. These differences are most likely because of both methodological limitations and differences among the populations studied. Some robust nomograms exist (particularly those from the USA); however, it has been demonstrated that if adopted in other countries/continents, they may generate an unpredictable bias in the evaluation of BP values in children. Actual pediatric BP nomograms present consistent limitations that affect the evaluation of BP in children. Comprehensive nomograms, which are based on a large population of healthy children (including neonates/infants) and use standardized methodology, are warranted for every country/region.