Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/105135b0
ALL scientific workers whose research has brought them into contact with military authority during the war must appreciate the leading article on “Science and the New Army” in NATURE of March 18, especially the sentences in which it is urged that “science linked to the Army by fussy research co-ordinators acting under a nescient soldier will not solve the difficulty,” and that “science will not occupy its rightful position in the new Army” until the General Staff includes a due proportion of officers who are endowed with a scientific spirit and have received a scientific training. Until then some of the outstanding defects manifested during the war will continue. These defects are:—
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts