Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/027482a0
MR. A. R. WALLACE has been so good as to forward me the extract from the Japan Mail above referred to, together with his reply. The article in question bears the title, “Protection by Mimicry—a Problem in Mathematical Zoology.” The authors, while admitting the broad principles involved in Dr. Fritz Muller's theory, fail to see why the advantage derived by the mimicking species, in cases where the latter is less numerous than the model, should be as the square of the relative numbers. They admit that “the ingenious explanation seems perfectly satisfactory,” but the proportional benefit appeared to them exaggerated. Mr. Wallace has now, I think, cleared up the misunderstanding with reference to this part of the question, but it may be of use in assisting towards the further discussion of the problem if I here give the simple algebraical treatment adopted in the original paper.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts