Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1037/h0074682
Discusses whether the sensation factors in visual depth perception have an original attribute of extension which is analogous but different to quality and intensity. Experiments on depth perception by Wundt, Hillebrand and Arrer are subjected to careful examination; and theories that make sensations of movement the essential factor of all space-perception have been outlined and criticized. Concludes that: (1) the third dimension is not a new content but is a form in which the contradictions between the two-dimensional attributes of the two groups of sensations (one from each eye) is eliminated (2) visual depth is conditioned by a relation of contradiction between the two-dimensional data of the retinal images or by the muscle-sensations connected with these images; and (3) depth is a form rather than a content of perception, and is not an original attribute of sensation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts