Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The author gives a résumé of the principal theories of the cause of the aurora published since 1896,—;those of Birkeland, Arrhenius and Nordmann— and points out the flaws in each one. All agree in considering the auroral rays as a luminescence produced by the absorption of cathode rays in the atmosphere, but none seem capable of explaining all the phenomena. Birkeland's first theory rests on the hypothesis that cathode rays emitted by the Sun are attracted by the Earth's magnetic poles, producing the aurora by their absorption in the atmosphere. This seems incapable of explaining the diverse forms of the aurora, and the changes taking place in a single appearance of the phenomenon.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | 
| views | 36 | |
| downloads | 10 | 

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts