Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Luminescence nanothermometry has emerged over the past decade as an exciting field of research due to its potential applications where conventional methods have demonstrated to be ineffective. Preclinical research has been one of the areas that have benefited the most from the innovations proposed in the field. Nevertheless, certain questions concerning the reliability of the technique under in vivo conditions have been continuously overlooked by most of the scientific community. In this proof-of-concept, hyperspectral in vivo imaging is used to explain how unverified assumptions about the thermal dependence of the optical transmittance of biological tissues in the so-called biological windows can lead to erroneous measurements of temperature. Furthermore, the natural steps that should be taken in the future for a reliable in vivo luminescence nanothermometry are discussed together with a perspective view of the field after the findings here reported.
Tissue, Luminescence, Nanothermometry, Temperature, Attenuation, Física, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity, Nanoparticles, Luminescent thermometry
Tissue, Luminescence, Nanothermometry, Temperature, Attenuation, Física, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity, Nanoparticles, Luminescent thermometry
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 108 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts