Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 36239348
pmc: PMC10749454
Diagnostics is an important part of medical practice. The information required for diagnosis is typically collected by performing diagnostic tests, some of which include imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most widely used and effective imaging techniques. To improve the sensitivity and specificity of MRI, contrast agents are used. In this review, the usage of metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) and composite materials based on them as contrast agents for MRI is discussed. MOFs are crystalline porous coordination polymers. Due to their huge design variety and high density of metal ions, they have been studied as a highly promising class of materials for developing MRI contrast agents. This review highlights the most important studies and focuses on the progress of the field over the last five years. The materials are classified based on their design and structural properties into three groups: MRI-active MOFs, composite materials based on MOFs, and MRI-active compounds loaded in MOFs. Moreover, an overview of MOF-based materials for heteronuclear MRI including 129Xe and 19F MRI is given.
HB acknowledges the support from the SPP 1928, COORNETs supported by the German Research Foundation. DJ acknowledges the support from the MH CR-DRO (Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, IN00023001) and from the project National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (Programme EXCELES, Project No. LX22NPO5104) funded by the European Union - Next Generation EU.
Ions, metal−organic frameworks, magnetic resonance imaging, nanomedicine, theranostics, multimodal imaging, Metals, ddc:530, Contrast Media, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Metal-Organic Frameworks
Ions, metal−organic frameworks, magnetic resonance imaging, nanomedicine, theranostics, multimodal imaging, Metals, ddc:530, Contrast Media, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Metal-Organic Frameworks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 63 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts