
handle: 20.500.12556/RUL-152827
Digital image correlation (DIC) is a powerful tool for characterising materials and determining material model parameters. To assess the reliability of the full-field measurement-based inverse identification procedures, it is crucial to investigate the impact of the measurement errors on the identified material model parameters. Literature indicates that conventional error propagation models, which rely on Gaussian noise-contaminated data, significantly overestimate the confidence for inversely identified material model parameters, resulting in misleadingly narrow confidence intervals. A more precise assessment of systematic errors originating from the experimental setup leads to an improved prediction of the confidence intervals, but this requires specific information about the DIC equipment, post-processing details, and a skilled experimentalist. In this work, we propose an alternative two-stage error propagation model that yields more realistic confidence interval predictions based solely on a database of past mechanical experiments conducted with the specific stereo DIC system set up in a particular way. We have validated the proposed procedure numerically using the open-hole test and an orthotropic elastic material model. Our predictions reveal a non-Gaussian probability distribution of the inversely identified material model parameters, with confidence intervals considerably wider than those obtained by considering random Gaussian noise. Furthermore, these predictions were experimentally validated in an extensive experimental campaign investigating a pultruded carbon fibre epoxy composite. .
Bibliografija: str. 11.
Abstract.
negotovost, korelacija digitalnih slik, Confidence intervals, 0205 Optical Physics, VIRTUAL FIELDS, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/620.1/.2, NOISE, intervali zaupanja, negotovost, polje deformacij, korelacija digitalnih slik, mehanično testiranje, heterogeni test, 0999 Other Engineering, polje deformacij, digital image correlation, heterogeneous test, uncertainty, confidence intervals, 2D, 5102 Atomic, molecular and optical physics, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/620.1/2:004.932, Science & Technology, SUBSET SIZE, Uncertainty, Digital image correlation, intervali zaupanja, mehanično testiranje, Mechanical testing, Optics, heterogeni test, full-field measurements, Optoelectronics & Photonics, DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION, 0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering, mechanical testing, 4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware, Physical Sciences, Heterogeneous test, Full-field measurements, SPECKLE PATTERNS, confidence intervals, nncertainty, full-field measurements, digital image correlation, mechanical testing, heterogeneous test
negotovost, korelacija digitalnih slik, Confidence intervals, 0205 Optical Physics, VIRTUAL FIELDS, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/620.1/.2, NOISE, intervali zaupanja, negotovost, polje deformacij, korelacija digitalnih slik, mehanično testiranje, heterogeni test, 0999 Other Engineering, polje deformacij, digital image correlation, heterogeneous test, uncertainty, confidence intervals, 2D, 5102 Atomic, molecular and optical physics, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/620.1/2:004.932, Science & Technology, SUBSET SIZE, Uncertainty, Digital image correlation, intervali zaupanja, mehanično testiranje, Mechanical testing, Optics, heterogeni test, full-field measurements, Optoelectronics & Photonics, DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION, 0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering, mechanical testing, 4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware, Physical Sciences, Heterogeneous test, Full-field measurements, SPECKLE PATTERNS, confidence intervals, nncertainty, full-field measurements, digital image correlation, mechanical testing, heterogeneous test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
