Views provided by UsageCounts
arXiv: 2008.05297
handle: 20.500.14243/402940
OWL ontologies are nowadays a quite popular way to describe structured knowledge in terms of classes, relations among classes and class instances. In this paper, given a target class T of an OWL ontology, we address the problem of learning fuzzy concept inclusion axioms that describe sufficient conditions for being an individual instance of T. To do so, we present Fuzzy OWL-BOOST that relies on the Real AdaBoost boosting algorithm adapted to the (fuzzy) OWL case. We illustrate its effectiveness by means of an experimentation. An interesting feature is that the learned rules can be represented directly into Fuzzy OWL 2. As a consequence, any Fuzzy OWL 2 reasoner can then be used to automatically determine/classify (and to which degree) whether an individual belongs to the target class T.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, real-valued AdaBoost, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Concept inclusion axioms, Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence, Boosting, Fuzzy logic, OWL Ontology, Machine Learning, machine learning, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Fuzzy Logic, Knowledge representation, Machine learning, fuzzy logic, concept inclusion axioms, Real-valued AdaBoost, OWL 2 ontologies
FOS: Computer and information sciences, real-valued AdaBoost, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Concept inclusion axioms, Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence, Boosting, Fuzzy logic, OWL Ontology, Machine Learning, machine learning, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Fuzzy Logic, Knowledge representation, Machine learning, fuzzy logic, concept inclusion axioms, Real-valued AdaBoost, OWL 2 ontologies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts